You’re good to treat __init__.py as either a stub or a clean export surface, depending on how polished you want the module to feel inside the Coeus Protocol tree.

Here’s the simple rule:

🧩 If you want it to behave like a proper importable package

Then __init__.py should expose the public‑facing classes so your friend (or future you) can do:

from coeus_rtt import ResonanceCore, DimensionalCore, CoeusRTTAdapter

That means your __init__.py would look like:

# __init__.py
 
from .dimensional_core import DimensionalCore
from .resonance_core import ResonanceCore
from .protocol_adapter import CoeusRTTAdapter
 
__all__ = [
    "DimensionalCore",
    "ResonanceCore",
    "CoeusRTTAdapter",
]

This makes the package feel intentional, clean, and ready for development.

🧪 If you want it minimal for now#

You can leave it empty. Python will still treat the directory as a package, and everything will work fine with explicit imports like:

from coeus_rtt.dimensional_core import DimensionalCore

This is totally valid during early development.

🌐 My recommendation#

Since you’re building a wrapped resonance structural aware dimensional core, it’s worth giving it a clean import surface. It signals:

“This is a real module.”
“These are the intended entry points.”
“Everything else is internal machinery.”

It also makes the Coeus Protocol doc cleaner when you show usage examples.

If you want, I can help you add a tiny docstring to the __init__.py that frames the whole package in Coeus/RTT language without being heavy-handed.