TriadicFrameworks
Overview

🌐 RFC-049 - A Resonance Structural Awareness Dimensional Interface

By Nawder Loswin 1/4/2026 © www.TriadicFrameworks.org#

RTT‑Inside Core API — RFC Skeleton (Draft 0.1)#

A Resonance Structural Awareness Dimensional Interface#

Internet‑Draft                                             Triadic Frameworks
Intended status: Standards Track                               January 2026
Expires: TBD

                 RTT‑Inside Core API (RTT‑Core)
      A Resonance Structural Awareness Dimensional Interface
                     draft-rtt-core-api-00

Abstract#

A concise summary of the purpose of the RTT‑Inside Core API.
This section explains that RTT‑Core defines a domain‑agnostic interface for representing, exchanging, and interpreting resonance‑based environmental data, including clarity, drift, stress, and structural coherence.
It also states that the API provides a foundation for multi‑agent systems, mesh networks, industrial safety systems, and device‑level integrations.

Status of This Memo#

Standard boilerplate indicating this is a working draft, subject to change, and not yet a finalized standard.

Copyright Notice#

Standard RFC copyright text.

Table of Contents#

  1. Introduction
  2. Terminology
  3. Architectural Overview
  4. Core Concepts
  5. Data Model
  6. Transport Bindings
  7. API Endpoints
  8. Agent Bindings
  9. Extension Framework
  10. Security Considerations
  11. Privacy Considerations
  12. IANA Considerations
  13. References
  14. Acknowledgments

1. Introduction#

Describes the motivation for RTT‑Inside:

  • the need for a unified resonance‑aware interface
  • the role of clarity, drift, and structural resonance in multi‑agent systems
  • the cross‑domain applicability (mining, ATC, deep sea, mobile devices, etc.)
  • the goal of providing a stable, vendor‑neutral API

2. Terminology#

Defines key terms used throughout the document, including:

  • Resonance Field
  • Clarity Score
  • Drift Vector
  • Stress Hint
  • Resonance Zone
  • Mesh Node
  • Resonance Event
  • Composite Risk
  • Extensions
  • Domain Variant

3. Architectural Overview#

High‑level description of the RTT‑Core architecture:

  • sensor ingestion
  • RTT‑Micro‑Core processing
  • zone aggregation
  • mesh coordination
  • agent‑level consumption
  • domain‑specific extensions

Includes a conceptual diagram (ASCII or referenced).

4. Core Concepts#

Explains the foundational ideas behind RTT‑Inside:

  • resonance as a structural signal
  • clarity as a stability metric
  • drift as directional change
  • composite risk as a fused interpretation
  • zones as logical partitions
  • nodes as field contributors
  • meshes as distributed resonance networks

5. Data Model#

Defines the canonical JSON Schemas for:

  • ResonanceFieldSample
  • ResonanceZoneState
  • NodeDescriptor
  • ResonanceAlert
  • RouteSuggestion

Each subsection references the formal JSON Schema and describes its purpose, required fields, and extension points.

6. Transport Bindings#

Specifies how RTT‑Core objects are transported.
Includes:

  • HTTP/JSON baseline binding
  • optional MQTT topic structure
  • optional gRPC/Protobuf binding
  • rules for versioning and backward compatibility

7. API Endpoints#

Defines the normative API surface:

  • /field-samples
  • /zones/{zone_id}/state
  • /nodes/register
  • /alerts
  • /routes/suggest

Each endpoint includes:

  • method
  • request schema
  • response schema
  • error model
  • caching rules
  • rate‑limit considerations (if any)

8. Agent Bindings#

Describes how open‑source AI agents interact with RTT‑Core:

  • local SDK expectations
  • event subscription model
  • clarity/drift accessors
  • safety‑critical behavior requirements
  • deterministic fallback behavior

This section ensures agents behave consistently across vendors.

9. Extension Framework#

Explains how domain‑specific modules extend RTT‑Core without breaking invariants.
Defines:

  • extension namespaces (e.g., rtt.coal.v1)
  • rules for adding fields
  • rules for optional vs. required extensions
  • compatibility requirements
  • examples of domain extensions

10. Security Considerations#

Discusses:

  • authentication and authorization
  • integrity of resonance data
  • mesh poisoning risks
  • replay attacks
  • safety‑critical system isolation
  • recommended cryptographic practices

11. Privacy Considerations#

Covers:

  • handling of location data
  • handling of device identifiers
  • retention policies
  • anonymization of field samples
  • cross‑domain privacy boundaries

12. IANA Considerations#

If applicable, defines:

  • new media types
  • new URN namespaces
  • new OID allocations

13. References#

Split into:

  • Normative references (JSON Schema, HTTP, UUID, ISO‑8601)
  • Informative references (Triadic Frameworks docs, domain papers, etc.)

14. Acknowledgments#

Credits contributors, reviewers, and organizations.

Appendices (Optional)#

A. Example Payloads
B. Example Mesh Topologies
C. Example Agent Integration
D. Domain Extension Samples (Coal, ATC, Deep Sea, etc.)

If you want, I can now populate each section with draft text, or generate a complete RFC‑style document ready for submission formatting.

Powered by Docsbook